<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: May 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/05/29/473/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/05/29/473/</link>
	<description>Discussions of religion and ethics from an atheist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windrider</title>
		<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/05/29/473/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Windrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/05/29/473/#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must say I was a bit disturbed by your opening page, especially the apparent &quot;automatic&quot; nature of my theoretical conversion.  Despite the obvious humour and intended sarcasm, I was mildly offended.  Then again, I suppose that was part of the point.  I was relieved to see that the rest of your website is mainly calm, rational, and focused on intelligent debate and discussion.  I commend you for that.  As a theist, I can&#039;t say I agree with all of the points made here, but it is refreshing to see a discussion of atheism/theism with respect and consideration as the rule, and not the exception.  That&#039;s a rare thing in topics of this nature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I was a bit disturbed by your opening page, especially the apparent &#8220;automatic&#8221; nature of my theoretical conversion.  Despite the obvious humour and intended sarcasm, I was mildly offended.  Then again, I suppose that was part of the point.  I was relieved to see that the rest of your website is mainly calm, rational, and focused on intelligent debate and discussion.  I commend you for that.  As a theist, I can&#8217;t say I agree with all of the points made here, but it is refreshing to see a discussion of atheism/theism with respect and consideration as the rule, and not the exception.  That&#8217;s a rare thing in topics of this nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
