Comments on: Hate Mail

By: crickets

crickets — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:14:55 +0000

scientist: “so this constant X, with a value of 1.23, describes the ratio between Y and Z… you can see th-”

creationist: “what? why?!”

scientist: “what? wait, what? I told you, the ratio between Y and Z is 1.23, it’s a constant which describes the force of-”

creationist: “but why isn’t it a million?”

scientist: “well, because the values and Y and Z would need to be extremely different from what we observe to yeild a ratio anywhere near one million. the physical laws of our universe just don’t work that way. if Y was that large the sun would explode.”

creationist: “oh.”

…

creationist, much later: “and so you see, students, out of the entire range of possible values, Y just HAPPENS to be exactly what we need for life to exist… why, if it were any different the sun would explode! clearly, only god’s intervention can explain this precisely tuned value.”

By: Louie the 13th

Louie the 13th — Fri, 15 May 2009 20:17:27 +0000

ridiculous and so aggressive yet again. why is this person making out that the universe and human life all happened at once like some kind of miracle? this also appears to be the reason why they also believe so strongly that the chances of us existing without some kind of creator are impossible? the universe is surely immensely large and extremely old, (if time even affects the universe at all is another question) therefore whats to say that the universe has went through many stages before eventually being fit enough to sustain OUR life after eons and eons?? and yes, that is only including OUR life, there could have many before us and many could exist elsewhere.

By: Will

Will — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:25:47 +0000

Lay off the sauce Kirk Cameron. It’s the recycling of the “look at trees” argument and is equally as weak.

By: nghtshd

nghtshd — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:20:29 +0000

Anyway, my pants don’t fit very well at all, so where is his God now?

By: Mytho

Mytho — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:42:18 +0000

This guy must be one of those who have so little faith, that need of science to make them think that there’s actually some weight behind their particular delirium.

I respect a lot more those folks who have faith, regardless of the overwhelming evidence against the very existence of ther sky fairy father, and don’t need the concourse of science to make them feel more at ease with their beliefs.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:56:00 +0000

“Dog-kins?” Really?