<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: December 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/12/27/762/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/12/27/762/</link>
	<description>Discussions of religion and ethics from an atheist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olorin</title>
		<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/12/27/762/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Olorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2007/12/27/762/#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your correspondent finds fault with science because &quot;the ideas and theories are constantly changing.&quot;  Does he not realize that this is what science is all about?  If new objective evidence did not fill out and change the theories, we would call it &quot;religion,&quot; not &quot;science.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He also cavils that, in 50 years since scientists discovered the genetic code, they do not yet know everything about life.  He should remember how long it took from the discovery of how to get to the Moon until we actually got there: more than 300 years from Newton to NASA.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Denial of evolution and ignorance seem to go together.  Acceptance of evolution rises steadily with increasing levels of education, regardless of the subject of the education.  Graduate education in biology, geology, anthropology, and related sciences increases acceptance dramatically.  Creationists see this as a world-wide conspiracy, but the more parsimonious explanation is that greater understanding of the relevant evidence promotes greater acceptance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your correspondent finds fault with science because &#8220;the ideas and theories are constantly changing.&#8221;  Does he not realize that this is what science is all about?  If new objective evidence did not fill out and change the theories, we would call it &#8220;religion,&#8221; not &#8220;science.&#8221;</p>
<p>He also cavils that, in 50 years since scientists discovered the genetic code, they do not yet know everything about life.  He should remember how long it took from the discovery of how to get to the Moon until we actually got there: more than 300 years from Newton to NASA.</p>
<p>Denial of evolution and ignorance seem to go together.  Acceptance of evolution rises steadily with increasing levels of education, regardless of the subject of the education.  Graduate education in biology, geology, anthropology, and related sciences increases acceptance dramatically.  Creationists see this as a world-wide conspiracy, but the more parsimonious explanation is that greater understanding of the relevant evidence promotes greater acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
