Tract #1: Types of atheism

With my current work situation, I’m finding it impossible to post the lengthy discussions I love on this blog. So instead of letting the site lay fallow, I’m going to try something new.

I’ve started to put together a series of little atheist “tracts” that you can read and share with others. These will cover general topics in atheism, common questions about atheism, difficulties facing atheists, and moral/ethical issues from a moral atheist perspective. As each is posted, I will ask you to comment on it in the discussion area of the announcement post, and I will make edits to the tract reflecting your comments when necessary.

I hope to be able to put up one or two of these a week until we have a library of 50 or so. I think that would be a neat atheist resource!

So, to get the ball rolling, here’s tract #1: Types of Atheism. Download it, see page #3 for printing instructions, and let me know your comments! Thanks!

001_types-of-atheism.pdf


Types of Atheism

An atheist is someone who does not have any religious beliefs. In a more narrow sense, an atheist is someone who does not believe that God — or any deities — exist. But not all atheists are the same.
Positive (or weak) atheists disbelieve in deities because the existence of deities has not been proven.

Moral atheists are positive atheists whose moral viewpoint is derived from a few basic logical principles, and who find that these principles also imply atheism. A moral atheist may see atheism as more of a side effect of his or her beliefs than the core of those beliefs. (This series of pamphlets was written from the point of view of a moral atheist.)

An agnostic atheist is someone who does not believe in deities, but believes that the existence of deities cannot be proven or disproven. An agnostic atheist might say, “Theists have the burden of proof for the existence of God, and since such proof is impossible, there is no reason to believe that God exists.”

To be clear, one may be an agnostic theist (believing in a deity though proof is impossible), an agnostic atheist (not believing in deities although — or because — proof is impossible), or simply an agnostic (neither believing nor disbelieving in deities because it’s impossible to discover the truth).

Strong atheists believe that there definitely are no deities. Some strong atheists believe that the non-existence of deities can be proven (because, for example, deities are logically impossible). Some people assume that all atheists are strong atheists, but this is not the case.

Reactive atheists disbelieve in deities because they reject theism. A reactive atheist disbelieves in God not because such disbelief is logically required, but for more personal, emotional reasons. A reactive atheist is likely also be a strong atheist.
Practical atheists do not see deities as useful concepts.

Noncoherent atheists hold that one cannot even have a conversation about the existence of God because the word “God” does not have coherent meaning.
Atheists by default are those who do not have belief in deities because they are incapable of having such a belief or have not considered the possibility that deities exist. Newborn babies would be atheists by default. (Some people do not even consider this to truly be a form of atheism because it is not a considered opinion.)

Although these terms broadly cover the majority of atheists, they are not intended as comprehensive, and some of their definitions continue to be the subject of discussion.

Remember, too, that atheists may vary quite a bit in how they prefer to refer to their beliefs. Some agnostic atheists like to be called “atheist,” but some prefer “agnostic.” Some atheists, when asked, will say that they are “not religious” or otherwise avoid the word atheist because they think it brings with it too much cultural baggage.

When it comes to our personal philosophy and beliefs, it’s what we think and not what we call ourselves that’s important. Labels are useful, but don’t let yourself get hung up on then.

Posted on June 7, 2009 at 10:05 pm by ideclare · Permalink
In: Tract

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments via RSS

  1. Written by Kim
    on June 8, 2009 at 12:50 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    You should do a version that can be read online as well.

    • Written by ideclare
      on June 8, 2009 at 8:38 pm
      Reply · Permalink

      This is a good point — the PDFs are a pain to read on the screen.

Subscribe to comments via RSS

Leave a Reply