<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tract #28: What Is Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2009/08/23/tract-28-what-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2009/08/23/tract-28-what-is-good/</link>
	<description>Discussions of religion and ethics from an atheist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joakim Rosqvist</title>
		<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2009/08/23/tract-28-what-is-good/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Joakim Rosqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/?p=1269#comment-464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the key word is choice. Ultimately that is why we dislike being sick, injured or incarcerated - our choices are limited.
Imagine a diagram where the X axis is time, from now onto infinity. The Y axis is total choice available, defined as the sum of the choices available for all the actors in the universe at that point in time.

&#039;Good&#039; can then be seen as the area under the curve, i.e. the better alternative is the one that leads to a future with a larger area under the curve - more potential choices for future actors.

In practice, we can not correctly determine how our actions now will affect every other actor at every point in the future, &quot;butterfly&quot; effects and all. So a definition of good for us imperfect beings should include a weight factor that starts high and falls towards zero the further into the future we look, according to how much dimmer our crystal balls get.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key word is choice. Ultimately that is why we dislike being sick, injured or incarcerated &#8211; our choices are limited.<br />
Imagine a diagram where the X axis is time, from now onto infinity. The Y axis is total choice available, defined as the sum of the choices available for all the actors in the universe at that point in time.</p>
<p>&#8216;Good&#8217; can then be seen as the area under the curve, i.e. the better alternative is the one that leads to a future with a larger area under the curve &#8211; more potential choices for future actors.</p>
<p>In practice, we can not correctly determine how our actions now will affect every other actor at every point in the future, &#8220;butterfly&#8221; effects and all. So a definition of good for us imperfect beings should include a weight factor that starts high and falls towards zero the further into the future we look, according to how much dimmer our crystal balls get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
