Tract #50: Do Atheists Want Freedom from Responsibility?

Tract #50, Do Atheists Want Freedom from Responsibility?, answers one of the most annoying accusations leveled at atheists. It is ready for you to print and hand out. Download it, see page #3 for printing instructions, and let me know your comments! Thanks!


Do Atheists Want Freedom from Responsibility?

It is not uncommon for an atheist to be told, “You reject God because you want to lead a sinful life without having to feel responsible for your actions.” For a moral atheist, this accusation fails on at least three levels.

The truth

Moral atheism isn’t about believing what one wants to believe, it’s about believing what is likely to be true. An atheist cannot disbelieve in God solely because God punishes evil any more than an atheist could disbelieve in trolls solely because trolls eat naughty children.

Either God exists or God does not exist — personal desires have nothing to do with the matter.

A moral life

Many — even most — atheists lead lives that are not particularly “sinful.” The author of this tract is married, monogamous, honest, and polite, and does not smoke, drink, use recreational drugs, or gamble (aside from buying an occasional lottery). Does this sound like someone who has rejected God for the purpose of indulging vices?

You might consider an atheist to be leaving a sinful life in the sense of breaking those of the Ten Commandments which demand worship and respect for God. But in that case, the original argument becomes, “You reject God because you want to sinfully not believe in God,” and that’s not much of an accusation.

Still restricted

The biggest problem with this accusation is that it assumes that an atheist does not have a compelling, objective reason to behave morally.

A moral atheist has a strong, well-thought-out personal morality that plays an important part in everything he or she does. Atheists believe that lying, murder, stealing, infidelity, and a whole host of other behaviors are morally wrong, whether or not they lead to divine punishment.

If you are religious, ask yourself if you would behave immorally if you knew there was no God. If you say yes, then aren’t you being moral only because you fear punishment?

Now think about the moral atheist who behaves morally because it is the right thing to do, even though there is no fear of a tortured afterlife for those who break moral laws. Which of you is more laudable? The person being good under threat, or the one being good on principle alone?

It’s a question worth thinking about before you accuse all atheists of immorality.

Posted on November 11, 2009 at 9:22 pm by ideclare · Permalink
In: About atheism, Tract

One Response

Subscribe to comments via RSS

  1. Written by CulturalIconography
    on November 11, 2009 at 9:36 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    And of course there’s always the observation that there were any number of moral systems which predated (in some cases by centuries or longer) the Judeo-Christian one. Confucianism springs to mind, if for no other reason than he articulated the so-called “Golden Rule” long before Jesus supposedly did. It seems as if prominent fundamentalist Christians think that history only begins with the Old Testament of the King James Bible. Of course, I guess in a way they do if they are Young Earth Creationists…but don’t get me started on that one.

Subscribe to comments via RSS

Leave a Reply