Tract #53: How Can There Be Justice Without God?

Tract #53, How Can There Be Justice Without God?, is ready for you to print and hand out. Download it, see page #3 for printing instructions, and let me know your comments! Thanks!

053_justice.pdf


How Can There Be Justice Without God?

Justice is, in a nutshell, fair punishment for doing wrong, and fair rewards for doing right. In life, it may be impossible to find just solutions in all situations — for example, it is not just for someone who kills five people to receive the same penalty as someone who kills fifty people, but it’s the best we can do. For true justice to be guaranteed, there must be some kind of reward or punishment after life ends. But, a theist might ask an atheist, if there is no God and no afterlife, how can there be justice?

The atheist’s answer? There can’t. There is no guarantee of justice in the universe.

To some people, this is inconceivable. What if a murderer is never caught? What if someone becomes a success by being a bully? If such a person isn’t punished in the afterlife, that isn’t fair!

And that’s true — it isn’t fair. But there is no law of physics or philosophy that says that things must be fair or that justice must be served. We might like it to be that way, but that does not make it so.

Now let’s look at theistic justice for a moment.

There are a number of ways that religions claim justice is brought to the world. Some religions say that after death you are reborn, and that your new life will be a reward or punishment for your acts in the previous life. This is philosophically consistent, but it can also lead to the assumption that anyone who is in a bad situation deserves what they get because they are being repaid for a past life’s evils. That’s not much of an incentive to help people in need.

Some religions claim that karma exists to enforce justice. If you do bad things, bad things come to you, and if you do good things, good things come to you. This is a nice idea, but it isn’t evident in every-day life.

Christianity holds that those who sin will be eternally punished in Hell. Depending on the type of Christianity, Christians may believe that you can get into Heaven by repenting for the bad you’ve done and doing good. Alternately, they may believe that good works are meaningless and everyone deserves to go to Hell, but that Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross was just punishment for everyone’s sins, and anyone who accepts him can go to Heaven.

The sacrifice of Jesus is an interesting way to keep the bookkeeping of justice balanced, but it leaves some people feeling that true justice hasn’t been done. For example, if Stalin accepted Jesus just before he died, then his sins would be balanced by Jesus and he could go to Heaven. Alternately, if Einstein never accepted Jesus, justice would be served by sending him to Hell.

The concept of Hell itself creates a number of questions related to justice. Is any crime truly deserving of eternal punishment without opportunity of repentance? Some would say that rejecting God is a sin large enough to merit eternal torment, but many of these people would also say that not being convinced that God is real is equivalent to rejecting God, and, to an atheist, being punished eternally because you don’t find an argument compelling doesn’t sound just at all.

Posted on November 17, 2009 at 10:11 pm by ideclare · Permalink
In: Tract

One Response

Subscribe to comments via RSS

  1. Written by Rick Lannoye
    on November 18, 2009 at 11:14 am
    Reply · Permalink

    Well, who is to say that the idea of “justice,” isn’t just bogus from the get go?

    Sure, it’s broadly (if vaguely) accepted that people who do bad things should be repaid in kind, but really, not only does that never happen in the real world, but talk like this is so superficial, and gives little consideration to circumstance. “Bad people” either have something seriously wrong with them, i.e., they’re missing the “empathy gene,” they theyselves were severely mistreated/abused or they’ve been swept up into some radical ideaology which twists their consciences inside out, and they may actually believe they’re doing good or what is necessary. In other words, ANY ONE OF US would be just like them had we, like them, through the ACCIDENTS of when and where to and to whom we were born, done the same!

    And then on top of this, what is really achieved by getting an eye for an eye. Surely not your eye back, but just another person half blind, and not to mention, the fact that now you, too, have blinded someone!

    I’ve actually written an entire book on this topic–”Hell? No! Why You Can Be Certain There’s No Such Place As Hell,” (for anyone interested, you can get a free ecopy of my book at my website: http://www.thereisnohell.com), but if I may, I’d like to add one more point–that Jesus, in his original, core message, rejected this entire notion of “justice.”

    He only saw this as an endless cycle of human pain. Since we’re all susceptible to doing bad things and having them done to us, his answer was to repent and forgive. To opt out completely from the notion that we have to get back at people for what they’ve done.

Subscribe to comments via RSS

Leave a Reply