Should African Americans be paid restitution for slavery in the U.S.?


The descendents of slaves in the United States should be paid restitution by the U.S. government for the wrongs done to their ancestors.

Q1 Analysis

This statement may be a Q1 violation if:

Q2 Analysis

Whether this is a Q2 violation depends on in under what other circumstances you would allow demands for restitution of historical wrongs.


Although it is laudable to think that countries should be held responsible for bad — or, in this case, arguably evil — policies, many practicalities have to be considered before restitution for slavery can be reasonably demanded.

The largest difficulty may be in identifying who is owed restitution without violating 2Q. Most likely, not all African Americans would be due restitution, since some of them are not descendants of American slaves. And those who are descendants of slaves are not necessarily the descendants only of slaves — perhaps their great, great grandfather was a slave, but their grandmother is from Jamaica or their mother is Japanese. Should people with only some slave ancestry receive equal payment? Someone who is white other than a black great grandfather, for example? And what about descendants of American slaves who no longer live in the United States?

The politics of slavery in America cause additional complications. If you learned that certain tribes in Africa helped white slavers capture people to be brought to America and sold, do you think those African tribes should also pay restitution? If so, then how should African Americans who are descendents of members of those tribes be treated? And what about descendants of slaves who aided in the slave trade or fought on the side of the South in the Civil War? Should they be treated any differently?

The simplest way to solve this might be to say that institutionalized racism harmed all black people (and continues to do so to this day) and therefore all African Americans (however that term is defined) are due restitution. How much money would be fair restitution? Since payment of restitution will not remove the harms of past institutionalized racism, then shouldn’t all African Americans — including those not yet born — receive payment until the effects are gone? What criteria will be used to judge when no more people are to be paid? Should affirmative action and similar programs and policies be considered part of restitution? Or canceled after the payment is made because now "everything is equal"?

Let’s say that the government does pay restitution. It is important to remember that the government raises money through taxes, so really it is American citizens (including African American citizens) who will be making restitution. If this payment is significant enough that it makes up for the evils of slavery, then it is possible that the redistribution of wealth will be significant enough to impact the American economy. What if there is significant negative financial fallout? In that case, could future non-African Americans argue that restitution to African Americans was a discriminatory practice by the government that negatively impacted their lives and therefore demand restitution?

Going further afield, if you think African Americans are due restitution, do you think restitution is due for the breaking of treaties with Native Americans, persecution of Mormons, Salem witch trials, Bay of Pigs, failure to give refuge to Jewish people during the Holocaust, or killing of British citizens during America’s rebellion?

None of these questions are meant to imply that governments should not be held accountable for damage that they cause to individuals or groups. But the farther you get from the time the damage was caused, the more difficult it is to correct it on an individual basis. This should be kept in mind when you are considering such issues.

You are encouraged to leave your answers to the questions posed in this post in the comments section. This post is based on an excerpt from Ask Yourself to be Moral, by D. Cancilla, available at and See the 2Q system page for details of the philosophical system mentioned in this post.

Posted on May 25, 2010 at 10:12 am by ideclare · Permalink
In: 2Q

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments via RSS

  1. Written by Zach
    on May 25, 2010 at 10:55 am
    Reply · Permalink

    Out of curiosity: Are there many people saying that African-Americans should be paid restitution for past slavery? Beyond affirmative action, I’ve never heard of this….

    • Written by ideclare
      on May 25, 2010 at 12:52 pm
      Reply · Permalink

      To my knowledge, it isn’t a big movement these days, but the subject does come up. I recall there being some discussion of it most recently when the U.S. House of Representatives officially apologized for slavery in 2008. If you search Google for “Should African Americans be paid restitution for slavery” there are quite a few relevant results, including a Wikipedia article that has some excellent links in its footnotes. One of the Wikipedia footnotes leads to a 2001 Seattle Times article about a National Reparations Convention in 2001, which contains some specifics about proposed reparations.

  2. Written by Anonymous
    on November 17, 2010 at 10:05 am
    Reply · Permalink

    No they shouldn’t theyre ancestors were the slaves not them ……

  3. Written by Anonymous
    on June 8, 2011 at 9:27 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    When Africa pays the Blacks that should be Proficient enough sence they are the ones who sold the captured slaves to the slave traders. ONLY IN AMERICA!! If by chance the Blacks do get this Payment, I think i will denounce my Citizenship to the U.S. and become a Sovereign Citizen.

  4. Written by Anonymous
    on October 20, 2011 at 7:26 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    YES YES YES.. the U.S. owes us 100 trillion dollars in reparations with a compounded interes of 6%. if they can spend trillions of dollars to kill ppl in Iraq and send men to the moon, they can def come up with a way to at least allow blacks a free college education; something!!. Germany has paid an estimated of 25 billion in reparations to Israeli Holocaust surviors and we cant even get a formal apology

  5. Written by Anonymous
    on December 4, 2011 at 6:37 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    Absolutely! If our government can recognize the wrong done to Jews during the Holocaust and set aside funds for restitution for them, why should slavery be any different? African-Americans have allowed the U.S. and other nations to get away with the crime of slavery. They need to get together and fight for what’s theirs.

  6. Written by Norman
    on February 27, 2013 at 1:27 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    This is a difficult issue, money will never heal the pain, suffring and heart ach that African American have suffered because of slavery and the carry over effect that it has had.

  7. Written by test
    on March 17, 2013 at 2:33 pm
    Reply · Permalink

    Great post. I used to be checking constantly this weblog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful info specially the final part I take care of such information much. I was looking for this particular info for a very lengthy time. Thanks and good luck

  8. Written by marley
    on January 18, 2015 at 7:30 am
    Reply · Permalink

    Funny let us first define reperation – which is reparitive justice for an in just law. Now let us define justice – which is make sure no one gets miss treated, and who ever needs the most help get the most constructive help. Before I continue does this makes dense, does this helps?

Subscribe to comments via RSS

Leave a Reply