<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should No-Fault Divorce Be Legal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2010/12/31/should-no-fault-divorce-be-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2010/12/31/should-no-fault-divorce-be-legal/</link>
	<description>Discussions of religion and ethics from an atheist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ff42</title>
		<link>http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/2010/12/31/should-no-fault-divorce-be-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>ff42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 20:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamanatheist.com/blog/?p=1674#comment-2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;shouldn&#039;t be allow&quot; implies coercion, particularly government force.   If  the reason for government is to protect &quot;life, liberty and pursuit (not attainment!) of happiness - otherwise known as property&quot; how can it logically be deduced that government ought to be involved in marriage (or divorce) in the first place?

Without government interference I would assume most marriages would be more like contracts and we have experience in dealing with prenuptial and failure-to-perform clauses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;shouldn&#8217;t be allow&#8221; implies coercion, particularly government force.   If  the reason for government is to protect &#8220;life, liberty and pursuit (not attainment!) of happiness &#8211; otherwise known as property&#8221; how can it logically be deduced that government ought to be involved in marriage (or divorce) in the first place?</p>
<p>Without government interference I would assume most marriages would be more like contracts and we have experience in dealing with prenuptial and failure-to-perform clauses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
